newton-based, large-scale optimization algorithm of Search Results


90
23andMe gwass
Gwass, supplied by 23andMe, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/newton-based%2C+large-scale+optimization+algorithm+of/bio_rxiv__2021__05__08__443158-76-26-30?v=23andMe
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gwass - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Anatis Bioprotection amra friction wear tribosystem
Amra Friction Wear Tribosystem, supplied by Anatis Bioprotection, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/newton-based%2C+large-scale+optimization+algorithm+of/10__1002_slash_tt__3020020408-9-24-29?v=Anatis+Bioprotection
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
amra friction wear tribosystem - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Metabase Inc e-metabase
E Metabase, supplied by Metabase Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/newton-based%2C+large-scale+optimization+algorithm+of/10__1016_slash_j__datak__2006__01__010-27-20-1?v=Metabase+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
e-metabase - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
WuXi AppTec large-scale mivm
Large Scale Mivm, supplied by WuXi AppTec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/newton-based%2C+large-scale+optimization+algorithm+of/pm39799998-239-5-0?v=WuXi+AppTec
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
large-scale mivm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Blankney Estates large scale (5 ha)
Large Scale (5 Ha), supplied by Blankney Estates, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/newton-based%2C+large-scale+optimization+algorithm+of/pmc05491852-0-0-0?v=Blankney+Estates
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
large scale (5 ha) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Lonza large scale microbial biomanufacturing
Large Scale Microbial Biomanufacturing, supplied by Lonza, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/newton-based%2C+large-scale+optimization+algorithm+of/pm40439607-58-35-40?v=Lonza
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
large scale microbial biomanufacturing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Qualcomm Inc large scale lsvq
Large Scale Lsvq, supplied by Qualcomm Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/newton-based%2C+large-scale+optimization+algorithm+of/10__1109_slash_tpami__2024__3385364-325-4-26?v=Qualcomm+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
large scale lsvq - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Promega ribomaxexpress large-scale kit
Ribomaxexpress Large Scale Kit, supplied by Promega, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/newton-based%2C+large-scale+optimization+algorithm+of/pmc03816469-275-17-20?v=Promega
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ribomaxexpress large-scale kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Systec Inc scada systems
Scada Systems, supplied by Systec Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/newton-based%2C+large-scale+optimization+algorithm+of/10__1109_slash_access__2022__3211288-1585-21-4?v=Systec+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
scada systems - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Lonza 4d large scale electroporation
Efficient editing and HbF induction by targeting the +55 BCL11A erythroid enhancer in CD34+ HSPCs (A) Fifteen sgRNAs were designed to target core +55 BCL11A enhancer. Half E-Box/GATA (TGN7-9WGATAR) motifs which are binding sites for erythroid transcription factors TAL1 and GATA1 marked in the frame. (B) Indel frequency of 3xNLS-SpCas9 complexed with various gRNAs in CD34+ HSPCs measured by TIDE analysis. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 3 healthy donors (HD 4, HD 5 and HD6). (C) HbF induction by HPLC analysis in erythroid cells in vitro differentiated from RNP edited CD34+ HSPCs from three healthy donors (HD 4, HD 5 and HD 6). Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t -test. ns: nonsignificant, **** P < 0.0001. n = 3 healthy donors. (D) Indels analyzed by CRISPResso 2 following 3xNLS-Cas9: sg1449 RNP <t>electroporation</t> of CD34+ HSPCs. (E) Indels analyzed by CRISPResso 2 following 3xNLS-Cas9: sg1450 RNP electroporation of CD34+ HSPCs. (F) Reduction of BCL11A mRNA expression compared to safe locus editing by ddPCR in erythroid precursors. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 3 healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). (G) Cell expansion during erythroid differentiation. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 3 healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). (H) Enucleation by Hoechst staining at the terminal erythroid differentiation. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 3 healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). (I) Fraction of F cells by flow cytometry analysis. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with one-way ANOVA. ns: nonsignificant. n = 3 healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). (J) HbF levels by HPLC in in vitro differentiated erythroid cells from three healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with one-way ANOVA. ns: nonsignificant, *** P < 0.001.
4d Large Scale Electroporation, supplied by Lonza, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/newton-based%2C+large-scale+optimization+algorithm+of/bio_rxiv__2023__05__27__542323-202-2-1?v=Lonza
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
4d large scale electroporation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Nissen large scale gpu architectures
Efficient editing and HbF induction by targeting the +55 BCL11A erythroid enhancer in CD34+ HSPCs (A) Fifteen sgRNAs were designed to target core +55 BCL11A enhancer. Half E-Box/GATA (TGN7-9WGATAR) motifs which are binding sites for erythroid transcription factors TAL1 and GATA1 marked in the frame. (B) Indel frequency of 3xNLS-SpCas9 complexed with various gRNAs in CD34+ HSPCs measured by TIDE analysis. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 3 healthy donors (HD 4, HD 5 and HD6). (C) HbF induction by HPLC analysis in erythroid cells in vitro differentiated from RNP edited CD34+ HSPCs from three healthy donors (HD 4, HD 5 and HD 6). Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t -test. ns: nonsignificant, **** P < 0.0001. n = 3 healthy donors. (D) Indels analyzed by CRISPResso 2 following 3xNLS-Cas9: sg1449 RNP <t>electroporation</t> of CD34+ HSPCs. (E) Indels analyzed by CRISPResso 2 following 3xNLS-Cas9: sg1450 RNP electroporation of CD34+ HSPCs. (F) Reduction of BCL11A mRNA expression compared to safe locus editing by ddPCR in erythroid precursors. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 3 healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). (G) Cell expansion during erythroid differentiation. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 3 healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). (H) Enucleation by Hoechst staining at the terminal erythroid differentiation. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 3 healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). (I) Fraction of F cells by flow cytometry analysis. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with one-way ANOVA. ns: nonsignificant. n = 3 healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). (J) HbF levels by HPLC in in vitro differentiated erythroid cells from three healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with one-way ANOVA. ns: nonsignificant, *** P < 0.001.
Large Scale Gpu Architectures, supplied by Nissen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/newton-based%2C+large-scale+optimization+algorithm+of/10__1186_slash_s40623___021___01461___w-253-34-7?v=Nissen
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
large scale gpu architectures - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

fx500  (Sony)
90
Sony fx500
Efficient editing and HbF induction by targeting the +55 BCL11A erythroid enhancer in CD34+ HSPCs (A) Fifteen sgRNAs were designed to target core +55 BCL11A enhancer. Half E-Box/GATA (TGN7-9WGATAR) motifs which are binding sites for erythroid transcription factors TAL1 and GATA1 marked in the frame. (B) Indel frequency of 3xNLS-SpCas9 complexed with various gRNAs in CD34+ HSPCs measured by TIDE analysis. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 3 healthy donors (HD 4, HD 5 and HD6). (C) HbF induction by HPLC analysis in erythroid cells in vitro differentiated from RNP edited CD34+ HSPCs from three healthy donors (HD 4, HD 5 and HD 6). Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t -test. ns: nonsignificant, **** P < 0.0001. n = 3 healthy donors. (D) Indels analyzed by CRISPResso 2 following 3xNLS-Cas9: sg1449 RNP <t>electroporation</t> of CD34+ HSPCs. (E) Indels analyzed by CRISPResso 2 following 3xNLS-Cas9: sg1450 RNP electroporation of CD34+ HSPCs. (F) Reduction of BCL11A mRNA expression compared to safe locus editing by ddPCR in erythroid precursors. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 3 healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). (G) Cell expansion during erythroid differentiation. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 3 healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). (H) Enucleation by Hoechst staining at the terminal erythroid differentiation. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 3 healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). (I) Fraction of F cells by flow cytometry analysis. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with one-way ANOVA. ns: nonsignificant. n = 3 healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). (J) HbF levels by HPLC in in vitro differentiated erythroid cells from three healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with one-way ANOVA. ns: nonsignificant, *** P < 0.001.
Fx500, supplied by Sony, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/newton-based%2C+large-scale+optimization+algorithm+of/pmc07424231__mmc10-200-0-11?v=Sony
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fx500 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Efficient editing and HbF induction by targeting the +55 BCL11A erythroid enhancer in CD34+ HSPCs (A) Fifteen sgRNAs were designed to target core +55 BCL11A enhancer. Half E-Box/GATA (TGN7-9WGATAR) motifs which are binding sites for erythroid transcription factors TAL1 and GATA1 marked in the frame. (B) Indel frequency of 3xNLS-SpCas9 complexed with various gRNAs in CD34+ HSPCs measured by TIDE analysis. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 3 healthy donors (HD 4, HD 5 and HD6). (C) HbF induction by HPLC analysis in erythroid cells in vitro differentiated from RNP edited CD34+ HSPCs from three healthy donors (HD 4, HD 5 and HD 6). Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t -test. ns: nonsignificant, **** P < 0.0001. n = 3 healthy donors. (D) Indels analyzed by CRISPResso 2 following 3xNLS-Cas9: sg1449 RNP electroporation of CD34+ HSPCs. (E) Indels analyzed by CRISPResso 2 following 3xNLS-Cas9: sg1450 RNP electroporation of CD34+ HSPCs. (F) Reduction of BCL11A mRNA expression compared to safe locus editing by ddPCR in erythroid precursors. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 3 healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). (G) Cell expansion during erythroid differentiation. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 3 healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). (H) Enucleation by Hoechst staining at the terminal erythroid differentiation. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 3 healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). (I) Fraction of F cells by flow cytometry analysis. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with one-way ANOVA. ns: nonsignificant. n = 3 healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). (J) HbF levels by HPLC in in vitro differentiated erythroid cells from three healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with one-way ANOVA. ns: nonsignificant, *** P < 0.001.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Gene editing without ex vivo culture evades genotoxicity in human hematopoietic stem cells

doi: 10.1101/2023.05.27.542323

Figure Lengend Snippet: Efficient editing and HbF induction by targeting the +55 BCL11A erythroid enhancer in CD34+ HSPCs (A) Fifteen sgRNAs were designed to target core +55 BCL11A enhancer. Half E-Box/GATA (TGN7-9WGATAR) motifs which are binding sites for erythroid transcription factors TAL1 and GATA1 marked in the frame. (B) Indel frequency of 3xNLS-SpCas9 complexed with various gRNAs in CD34+ HSPCs measured by TIDE analysis. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 3 healthy donors (HD 4, HD 5 and HD6). (C) HbF induction by HPLC analysis in erythroid cells in vitro differentiated from RNP edited CD34+ HSPCs from three healthy donors (HD 4, HD 5 and HD 6). Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t -test. ns: nonsignificant, **** P < 0.0001. n = 3 healthy donors. (D) Indels analyzed by CRISPResso 2 following 3xNLS-Cas9: sg1449 RNP electroporation of CD34+ HSPCs. (E) Indels analyzed by CRISPResso 2 following 3xNLS-Cas9: sg1450 RNP electroporation of CD34+ HSPCs. (F) Reduction of BCL11A mRNA expression compared to safe locus editing by ddPCR in erythroid precursors. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 3 healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). (G) Cell expansion during erythroid differentiation. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 3 healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). (H) Enucleation by Hoechst staining at the terminal erythroid differentiation. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM, n = 3 healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). (I) Fraction of F cells by flow cytometry analysis. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with one-way ANOVA. ns: nonsignificant. n = 3 healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). (J) HbF levels by HPLC in in vitro differentiated erythroid cells from three healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3). Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with one-way ANOVA. ns: nonsignificant, *** P < 0.001.

Article Snippet: For Lonza 4D large scale electroporation, 1500 pmol (15 μM) of sg1617 or sg1618 was mixed with 500 pmol (5 μM) of 3xNLS-SpCas9-SpCas9 protein and added electroporation buffer (Lonza 4D, cat# V4XP-3024) up to 25 μl in one tube, 1500 pmol (15 μM) of sg1450 or sg1449 was mixed with 500 pmol (5 μM) of 3xNLS-SpCas9 protein and added electroporation buffer up to 25 μl in another tube.

Techniques: Binding Assay, In Vitro, Two Tailed Test, Electroporation, Expressing, Staining, Flow Cytometry

Gene editing HSPCs without ex vivo culture evades genotoxicity. (A) Cell size by forward scatter without (0 h) and with 24 h and 48 h of cytokine culture. (B) Fractions of cells in G0, G1, S and G2/M immediately after thawing or selection, 24 h and 48 h of pre-stimulation culture from three cryopreserved healthy donors mobilized with G-CSF and one fresh SCD patient donor mobilized with plerixafor (HD 2, HD 3, HD 31 and SCD 3) . Data are plotted as mean ± SEM. (C) Micronucleus analysis by In Vitro Micro Kit 48 h after RNP electroporation in CD34+ HSPCs without and with 24 h and 48 h of cytokines culture. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with one-way ANOVA. ns: nonsignificant, * P < 0.5, ** P < 0.01. n = 3-5 healthy donors (HD 2, HD3 and HD 32-34). (D) Design of ddPCR assays recognizing chr2p (telomeric to the BCL11A cleavage site) and chr1 as a reference autosome. (E) Enrichment of chr2p in sorted nuclei by ddPCR assay. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with one-way ANOVA. ns: nonsignificant. n = 3-5 healthy donors (HD 2, HD3 and HD 32-34). (F) Enrichment of chr2p in sorted micronuclei by ddPCR assay. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with one-way ANOVA. ns: nonsignificant, * P < 0.5, ** P < 0.01. n = 3-4 healthy donors (HD 2, HD3 and HD 32-34). (G) Overall editing by +58 drop-off ddPCR assay. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with one-way ANOVA. ns: nonsignificant, * P < 0.5, ** P < 0.01. n = 3-5 healthy donors (HD 2, HD3 and HD 32-34). (H) Frequency of long deletions/rearrangements (not including the templated 3 kb deletion/inversion expected for double editing) was calculated as overall edit - deletion - inversion - small indels from four ddPCR assays. Left was measured by +58 drop-off and +58 offset assays. Right was measured by +55 drop-off and +55 offset assays. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with one-way ANOVA. ns: nonsignificant, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001; n = 3-5 healthy donors (HD 2, HD3 and HD 32-34). (I) Frequency of long deletions/rearrangements (not including the templated 3 kb deletion/inversion expected for double editing) in engrafting cells as compared to input cells. Data are plotted as median with range. n = 3 donors for input (SCD 3, HD 29 and HD 35 for sg1617+sg1450 and sg1618+sg1449. HD 7, HD 13 and HD 14 for sg1618+sg1450), n = 9-12 primary recipients for engrafted. (J) CDKN1A expression, by RT-qPCR, in CD34+ HSPCs 5 (left) and 24 (right) hours after RNP electroporation from three healthy donors. Relative expression normalized to control sample 5 hours of pre-stimulation. Data are analyzed with the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t -test. ns: nonsignificant. * P < 0.05. n = 3 healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3).

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Gene editing without ex vivo culture evades genotoxicity in human hematopoietic stem cells

doi: 10.1101/2023.05.27.542323

Figure Lengend Snippet: Gene editing HSPCs without ex vivo culture evades genotoxicity. (A) Cell size by forward scatter without (0 h) and with 24 h and 48 h of cytokine culture. (B) Fractions of cells in G0, G1, S and G2/M immediately after thawing or selection, 24 h and 48 h of pre-stimulation culture from three cryopreserved healthy donors mobilized with G-CSF and one fresh SCD patient donor mobilized with plerixafor (HD 2, HD 3, HD 31 and SCD 3) . Data are plotted as mean ± SEM. (C) Micronucleus analysis by In Vitro Micro Kit 48 h after RNP electroporation in CD34+ HSPCs without and with 24 h and 48 h of cytokines culture. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with one-way ANOVA. ns: nonsignificant, * P < 0.5, ** P < 0.01. n = 3-5 healthy donors (HD 2, HD3 and HD 32-34). (D) Design of ddPCR assays recognizing chr2p (telomeric to the BCL11A cleavage site) and chr1 as a reference autosome. (E) Enrichment of chr2p in sorted nuclei by ddPCR assay. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with one-way ANOVA. ns: nonsignificant. n = 3-5 healthy donors (HD 2, HD3 and HD 32-34). (F) Enrichment of chr2p in sorted micronuclei by ddPCR assay. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with one-way ANOVA. ns: nonsignificant, * P < 0.5, ** P < 0.01. n = 3-4 healthy donors (HD 2, HD3 and HD 32-34). (G) Overall editing by +58 drop-off ddPCR assay. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with one-way ANOVA. ns: nonsignificant, * P < 0.5, ** P < 0.01. n = 3-5 healthy donors (HD 2, HD3 and HD 32-34). (H) Frequency of long deletions/rearrangements (not including the templated 3 kb deletion/inversion expected for double editing) was calculated as overall edit - deletion - inversion - small indels from four ddPCR assays. Left was measured by +58 drop-off and +58 offset assays. Right was measured by +55 drop-off and +55 offset assays. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and analyzed with one-way ANOVA. ns: nonsignificant, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001; n = 3-5 healthy donors (HD 2, HD3 and HD 32-34). (I) Frequency of long deletions/rearrangements (not including the templated 3 kb deletion/inversion expected for double editing) in engrafting cells as compared to input cells. Data are plotted as median with range. n = 3 donors for input (SCD 3, HD 29 and HD 35 for sg1617+sg1450 and sg1618+sg1449. HD 7, HD 13 and HD 14 for sg1618+sg1450), n = 9-12 primary recipients for engrafted. (J) CDKN1A expression, by RT-qPCR, in CD34+ HSPCs 5 (left) and 24 (right) hours after RNP electroporation from three healthy donors. Relative expression normalized to control sample 5 hours of pre-stimulation. Data are analyzed with the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t -test. ns: nonsignificant. * P < 0.05. n = 3 healthy donors (HD 1, HD 2 and HD 3).

Article Snippet: For Lonza 4D large scale electroporation, 1500 pmol (15 μM) of sg1617 or sg1618 was mixed with 500 pmol (5 μM) of 3xNLS-SpCas9-SpCas9 protein and added electroporation buffer (Lonza 4D, cat# V4XP-3024) up to 25 μl in one tube, 1500 pmol (15 μM) of sg1450 or sg1449 was mixed with 500 pmol (5 μM) of 3xNLS-SpCas9 protein and added electroporation buffer up to 25 μl in another tube.

Techniques: Ex Vivo, Selection, In Vitro, Electroporation, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Two Tailed Test